May 17, 2023
-

Industry news

Impact of Distributed Ledger Technology in Global Capital Markets

Source: XXX

The full report was first published by Global Financial Markets Association (GFMA).

Page 12: Collateral mobility

HQLAX’s Books and Records Digital Collateral Registry is a platform built on a private-permissioned DLT network provided by R3 Corda. It records the ownership transfers of securities, while the underlying securities remaining in the Custody location of the participating triparty agents and custodians. When collateral needs to be exchanged between participants, the platform enables instant and simultaneous transfers on the platform, so-called Delivery vs. Delivery Delivery (“DvD”), swapping ownership of securities and avoiding the traditional Custody chain and settlement cycle. Transactions can be predetermined to occur at precise times through the day. This reduces intraday credit exposures and liquidity requirements to enable capital savings and minimize the scope for trade fails.

Page 69: New Settlement DvD

DvD settlement is a type of settlement mechanic gaining unique prominence with the rise of DLT, that consists of swapping one security (or basket of securities) directly for another security (or basket of securities), with no involvement of cash or the traditional Custody chain. SS0 (books and record use case) is a predominant model of implementation for this settlement mechanic. Participants can swap assets in collateral management/repo transactions on a DLT, settling instantly as the DLT provides constant updates to internal custodian Books and Records (and may not need a lengthy settlement process at the CSD). HQLAX’s platform is a market example of DvD settlement, based upon the permissioned R3 Corda network. They have created a DLT- based operating model that enables their clients to exchange ownership of securities, between collateral pools, while the underlying securities remains with the CSD and Custodian – such certainty in settlement is aided by the permissioned nature of the network onwhich this solution is based.

Page 103: DLT Networks

The introduction of private-permissioned DLT networks since 2015 has driven DLT-based activity in capital markets. These networks embed privacy, consensus, regulatory compliance, and security features on the DLT to give companies more of a closed system. This contrasts with the public networks approach, where companies must add security layers on top of an open foundational layer. Two private-permissioned networks, Hyperledger and Corda, were established in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Since then, Corda has powered the majority of platform use cases, though financial institutions have also developed in-house platforms. Public networks also had notable developments over this period. In 2022, Ethereum converted its consensus algorithm from Proof-ofWork to Proof-of-Stake, creating a more scalable technological ecosystem for enterprise application. Smart contract languages have also seen development during this time with the introduction of DAML in 2019 and Solidity in 2014.

Page 103: DLT FMIs

Prominent FMI use cases have been driven by central banks partnering with consortia of financial institutions. For example, between 2017 to 2020, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (“MAS”) (as well as certain initiatives by the Bank of Canada) have developed a better understanding of how Clearing and Settlement, and payments could function in a DLT-based world. MAS found potential for DLT to shorten the settlement cycle below T+2 with on-DLT cash.261 Bank of Canada found in its wholesale payments testing that proof-of-work algorithms do not provide sufficient settlement finality and operational risk improvements.262 These insights may be key toward designing an optimal DLT-based Clearing and Settlement system. Financial market consortia launched HQLAX in 2017 and Fnality in 2019 to test and build DLT-based FMI. HQLAX focuses on DLT-based solutions for collateral management, while Fnality seeks to create a system of interoperable FMI on DLT to allow for immediate settlement. Each of these FMI initiatives is built on a permissioned network.

Page 104: DLT-based transactions

Issuances require platforms for Tokenization, settlement, and digital Custody; thus, activities in both platform and asset class capabilities have grown together. Among the earliest asset class use cases were Broadridge’s intraday repo pilot in 2017 and the World Bank’s issuance of the first global DLT-based bond in 2018. Since then, there have been two trends of note:

  • Use cases have been concentrated in fixed income, including for use in repo and other securities financing. Corporate bond issuances have been the most frequent use case since 2015, accounting for 10 of the 13 major use cases listed in the exhibit. Issuance, trading, settlement of repo, securities lending, and money market fund collateral use cases have been a recent trend over 2021-22, with most major financial institutions as notable participants in the space.
  • Almost all launched use cases have focused on digitally native issuances. Of the 11 major use cases listed in the exhibit, 10 were digitally native. One explanation may be simplicity; Security Tokens do not require interoperability and reconciliation between distributed ledger and traditional ledger to monitor the integrity of the security. The one exception was UBS’ digital bond launch on SIX and SDX; the dual listing meant that investors could trade and settle fully on DLT or via traditional avenues.

          -This chapter will deep dive on three categories drawn from the use cases identified above. The first cate- gory will examine collateral management across repos and OTC derivatives. For repos, it will examine J.P. Morgan’s Onyx intraday repo platform; for OTC derivatives, it will explore the HQLAX platform. The second category, sovereign and quasi-sovereign bonds, will highlight the two digital bond issuances completed by the European Investment Bank. And the final category will describe macro trends in Tokeni- zation of assets, with a brief case study on Tokenization of funds.

Page 104-106: 3.2 Deep Dive #1: Collateral Management

The objective of collateral management is to optimize collateral obligations such that only the required collateral is posted, avoiding over-collateralization.265 This is a significant activity at financial institutions, with the total value of collateral outstanding in the global financial system reaching over $19 trillion USD in 2022 Prudent collateral management releases securities which can be deployed more productively elsewhere. Key areas of collateral management include CCP default funds (discussed inChapter 2.2.3 Clearing and Settle- ment)266 and securities transactions (e.g., securities lending, repurchase agreements (repos), and OTC derivatives)

The 2008 Great Financial Crisis marked a watershed in collateral management following regulatory changes and developments in risk management. For example, Basel III reforms require banks to hold higher levels of high-quality liquid assets (“HQLA”) on balance sheets to meet LCR requirements. 267 High margin requirements for non-cleared derivatives have also been implemented to encourage central clearing of OTC derivatives and reduce systemic risks in the market.268 However, collateral management has typically been fragmented across multiple dimensions. Internally, some trading desks may manage siloed pools of collateral usually organized by asset class, without visibility across the full organization. Externally, financial institutions manage a patchwork of custodian and counterparty relationships that currently makes collateral mobility costly and complex. This frag- mentation leads to inefficient allocations of collateral across the activity centers of a firm, excessive over-collat- eralization in certain positions, as well as higher cost of collateral over suboptimal tenors.269 In addition, today’s deferred net settlement cycle means that access to collateral follows actual transactions with a further delay of up to two business days after settlement. The increased demand and stock of collateral held by financial institutions today becuse of post-crisis reforms underscores the utility of prudent collateral management, as well as the opportunity costs of inefficient collateral use. Financial institutions have been addressing this challenge by coordinating and centralizing collateral activ- ities within the enterprise. For example, global custodians offer software solutions that provide holistic views of assets across jurisdictions held with multiple custodians to facilitate collateral selection. This activity is typi- cally concentrated in the Treasury function of a financial institution.270 The introduction of DLT-based Books and Records or securities, combined with smart contract-driven automation, canintroduce further efficiencies into collateral management activities. Most financial institutions interviewed highlighted three key benefits from DLT:

  • Freed collateral: Shortened settlement cycles reduce length of time collateral is held, enabling tighter, more optimal intra-day liquidity and HQLA balances. A Books and Records implementation of DLT can obviate the need to settle via physical collateral movement through the Custody chain.
  • Operational efficiency: Use of smart contacts can automate processes like daily variation margin pay- ments, onboarding multiple custodians and CCPs, and other manually intensive processes.
  • Improved visibility: Shared ledger acts as a golden source, offering real-time visibility of trade and collateral status across counterparties and clearing houses. This enables central coordination across clearing houses, reducing risk overestimation and over-collateralization.

Page 106-108: 3.2.1 Repurchase Agreements

Repos are commonly used by financial institutions seeking to raise funding or to earn a return on surplus capital. 272 A significant portion of repos enable short-term access to funding, which adds liquidity and efficiency to the market. The European Central Bank estimates that 75% of Euro denominated repos are overnight.273 However, even overnight repos are not optimized for intraday liquidity needs at banks because access to actual repo funds and securities is governed by the traditional deferred (T+2) settlement structure. There are two forms of repos: a ‘bilateral repo’ administered directly between the lender and borrower, and a ‘triparty repo’ coordinated by a third-party agent.

Existing areas of inefficiency

  • Delayed settlement cycle traps collateral: Deferred settlement causes collateral to be kept from other productive uses and creates counterparty credit risk, which requires higher collateral value to mitigate.
  • Operational inefficiency: Current processes involve fragmented, manual processes between multiple par- ties: collateral needs to be transferred multiple times between borrower and lender custodians.274 Delays in collateral release may further have knock-on effects for the next trade, resulting in trade failure.
  • Lack of transparency: Financial institutions have limited visibility on the repo status across lifecycle and other market participants’ willingness/ability to engage in a repo/reverse repo.275

Impact of DLT and Tokenized Securities

DLT-based operations for Repos transactions can accelerate settlement, freeing trapped collateral and improving operational efficiencies. Intra-day repo transactions allow market participants to access liquidity for the exact period needed instead of overnight. This reduces unnecessary funding costs and improves market efficiency.

  1. The borrower (the “Repo Seller”) escrows assets to be used as collateral with traditional triparty agents.
  2. The lender (the “Repo Buyer”) transfers cash from their traditional demand deposit account (“DDA”) at JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA (“JPMCB”) into a deposit account at JPMCB maintained on the Onyx Digital Assets ledger (a “Blockchain Deposit Account,” or “BDA”).
  3. Once both participants have their assets in place, the trade details, which include both a “Settlement Time” and a “Maturity Time,” are entered into the application.
  1. are exchanged, leaving the Repo Seller with cash in their BDA and the Repo Buyer with an entitlement to the underlying securities, which are still sitting at the triparty agent. The Repo Buyer can transfer the cash outside of the Onyx Digital Assets ecosystem to fund settlements, make margin payments or otherwise make use of the proceeds.
  2. Prior to the Maturity Time, the cash is transferred back from the Repo Seller’s DDA into their BDA. At Maturity, the assets are swapped, and the collateral is left unencumbered.

This new settlement technology has allowed Repo Sellers and Repo Buyers on the Onyx Digital Asset Platform to achieve significant improvement in repo settlement efficiency and take advantage of new transaction types while staying within the structural framework that has governed the repo markets for years.

Settlement Efficiency

Requiring assets to be positioned before a trade can be entered into the application eliminates virtually all settlement fails. Onyx Digital Assets adds precision and certainty by including settlement and maturity times as part of the trade agreement.

New Transaction Types

By minimizing the settlement fail rate, introducing settlement and maturity times to the trade contract, and instituting per-minute interest accruals, it is possible for Repo Sellers to use the Digital Financing Service to meet their intraday cash management needs through intraday repos. Intraday borrowing has been viewed as an alternative to unsecured credit facilities, ensuring high priority payments are made on time and smoothing cash flows throughout the day. Onyx Digital Assets supports DvP settlement nearly 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The extended settlement window allows both borrowers and lenders who have previously been saddled with uninvested cash or unfunded securities positions at the end of the traditional settlement window to improve operational efficiency.

Structural Framework

Digital Financing offers a new technology to settle repos utilizing traditional triparty documentation, with trades governed by existing master repurchase agreements. Trading via Digital Financing fits into the same general risk and controls framework across J.P. Morgan’s Markets business. This includes transaction reporting, risk monitoring, electronic trading controls, and cyber security.

Page 108-111: 3.2.2 OTC Derivatives

OTC derivatives transactions require collateral in the form of initial margin (IM) and variation margin (VM). Since most OTC derivative volumes are now centrally cleared, the CCP manages the collection and management of margin requirements. However, IM and VM are required for non-centrally cleared (bilateral) OTC derivatives as well. Regulators introduced requirements for two-way posting of IM and use of VM for non-cleared OTC derivatives as part of post-crisis reforms.278

Initial margin (IM), typically determined as a percentage of contract notional value, is the collateral that both counterparties post at the start of the derivatives contract to reduce exposure to counterparty credit risk.279 Through the contract term, the value of both the underlying assets and the collateral posted fluctuate over time. Brokers or CCPs move margin funds between the counterparties to reflect movements in the underlying assets. If the margin balance in one account falls below a set minimum threshold (called the maintenance margin), the broker will initiate a margin call, requesting for the counterparty to contribute additional margin. The variation margin (VM) is the amount of cash or securities the counterparty must contribute to restore the margin balance to the initial margin.280 This ensures the collateral pool reflects the latest credit risk exposure on a daily or intra- day basis.281

Existing areas of inefficiency

While margining occurs at a large scale today, the process suffers from long and manual Clearing and Settle- ment, and Custody timelines.

  • Extended processing time trapping collateral: Slow processing time of margin calls and payments requires counterparties to prefund margin accounts, tying up collateral (a requirement that is amplified when such collateral must be held by an independent custodian).282
  • Operational inefficiency: Complex manual processes across long Custody chains are involved to coordinate VM calls and payment, particularly when securities are used as collateral.283 In times of volatility, custodians may not be able to move collateral across accounts fast enough, resulting in missed VM calls, leading to fur- ther market turmoil and margin calls.284
  • Lack of transparency: Local CCPs lack an overall view of counterparties’ collateral obligations and posi- tions across clearing houses, leading to risk overestimation. Asynchrony in market data leads to discrepancies in margin calculation, resulting in the need to reconcile.285

Some of these inefficiencies were highlighted during the recent U.K. LDI crisis in September of 2022. A brief recap of the crisis and the relevance of the inefficiencies identified above to some of the market participants is set out in the following section.

U.K. Liability-Driven Investing (LDI) Crisis, September 2022

Recap: what happened during the crisis?

LDI is an investment product popular with defined benefit pension funds, where pensioners are paid guaranteed monthly payouts. This is achieved by using derivatives like interest rate swaps and repos,286 to hedge inflation and interest rate risks.287, 288 Sovereign U.K. bonds (“Gilts”) and cash are commonly posted forms of collateral for these types of derivative products . The sharp rise in the yields of U.K. gilts in September 2022 resulted in a fall in the value of collateral that had been posted against these derivative products, triggering emergency margin calls. Most pension funds were required to exclusively post cash to meet these margin calls, as most margin agree- ments stipulated cash as the only acceptable form of LDI VM.289 As cash buffers were exhausted, pension funds liquidated their gilt holdings to raise further cash to post as margin for their derivative products. These sales exerted further downward pressure on gilt prices, further devaluing the gilt collateral balances the funds had posted and triggering further margin calls.290 Eventually, the Bank of England intervened to stabilize gilt prices.291

Operational inefficiency as a contributing factor

While LDI funds faced a liquidity crisis that limited their ability to meet their margin requirements, back office operational inefficiency was also an important contributor to the crisis.292 Assets held by pension funds usu- ally require days to settle, whereas collateral is typically required on an intraday or EoD basis. A liquidity buffer bridges the window between margin calls and liquidizing assets.293 The speed and scale at which gilt yields rose in September consumed unforeseen levels of liquidity in emergency margin requirements and required the liquid- ity buffer to be topped up at an unprecedented speed.294 Custodians, overwhelmed by the volume of processing requirements, became a bottleneck. One custodian serving large LDI fund managers could not process the margin calls in time even with extra staff from the U.S., given the high volumes and heavy manual processing involved.295 U.K. regulators subsequently requested that the bank to improve its operations.296

Potential for DLT to help improve collateral mobility: HQLAX

DLT can improve the operational processes of margin management in two ways: (1) DLT can provide solutions to improve collateral mobility and (2) the use of a shared ledger and common data standards can improve the trans- parency and visibility of margin calculations. HQLAX is one solution in the market today than is helping market participants improve the efficiency with which they move collateral (improvement (1) identified above).

Solutions to Improve Collateral Mobility: HQLAX

HQLAX is a technology provider that seeks to improve collateral mobility across market makers, triparty agents, and custodians by recording collateral ownership on DLT and using it to enable atomic DvD settlement. HQLAX does not issue tokens, instead it uses a DLT-based Digital Collateral Registry that records legal ownership of securities and all transfers of ownership. This “Books and Records” implementation of a DLT can integrate more easily with exchanges and existing post-trade infrastructure than solutions that require Tokenization of securities. Securities no longer move in the Custody chain and the associated traditional ledger. The Digital Collateral Registry becomes the golden source record for securities ownership, tracks securities at the ISIN level, and enables instantaneous, atomic gross settlement.

Potential Benefits of HQLAX in VM

  • Accelerated collateral deployment reducing trapped collateral: Increased throughput allows more frequent VM calls to be made intraday, enabling VM to return to the marketplace instantaneously. This enables participants to carry tighter, more optimized intraday liquidity balances.
  • Improved operational efficiency: Automating VM calls and avoiding physical settlement through the traditional Custody chain reduces settlement fails, the possibility of human error, and associated labor cost.
  • Transparency of information: Real-time visibility of trade status across CCPs allows better monitoring and more accurate margin obligation computation, reducing overcollateralization and increasing liquidity in the market. Shared ledger reduces discrepancy in margin computation.299

Apart from potential VM transactions, one of the most prominent current HQLAX use cases is collateral upgrades and downgrades (or collateral transformations), which involve the exchange of collateral securities between counterparties. In traditional markets, collateral transformations are executed via two DvP transactions (using cash as the common leg) or two Free of Payment (“FoP”) deliveries.300 These settlement mechanisms consume intraday liquidity or credit.  HQLAX provides those savings by avoiding cash or credit entirely and settling instantaneously through DvD. DvD is a DLT-based settlement mechanism that swaps one security (or basket of securities) directly for another security (or basket of securities) with no cash transactions.

It is important to note that the HQLAX platform is limited to use cases involving exclusively non-cash collateral that can be settled DvD. One reason HQLAX does not currently offer atomic settlement of traditional repo transactions or any derivative collateral transactions that involve a cash leg is because it does not integrate into DLT-based Payment Instruments settlement systems. DLT-based Payment Instruments becoming more widespread could facilitate atomic DvP settlement could becoming an HQLAX use case.

Page 176: Recommendation #3: Establish viable Primary and Secondary markets for high-potential asset classes

Market participants have been notably collaborating on specific DLT-related technology and financial market infrastructure initiatives. This cooperation can be seen in DLT platforms (e.g., R3), financial market infrastructure (e.g., Fnality), and, more recently, with particular services like collateral management (e.g., HQLAX). Such collab- oration could be deployed to pool liquidity in high potential asset classes (e.g., bonds, OTC derivatives, illiquid assets) and push the formation of liquidity to establish viable DLT-based markets.

Previous article

There is no previous post.

Next article

There is no next post.

Fnality and HQLAᵡ complete successful end-to-end testing of cross-chain intraday repo settlement

Fnality and HQLAᵡ complete successful end-to-end testing of cross-chain intraday repo settlement
Required "current page"

HQLAᵡ DLT Platform Surpasses €1bn Milestone on DvD Securities Lending Transactions

HQLAᵡ DLT Platform Surpasses €1bn Milestone on DvD Securities Lending Transactions
Required "current page"

HQLAᵡ closes a Series C funding round led by HSBC

HQLAᵡ closes a Series C funding round led by HSBC
Required "current page"

Redefining collateral mobility: a frictionless transfer of securities

Redefining collateral mobility: a frictionless transfer of securities
Required "current page"

Impact of Distributed Ledger Technology in Global Capital Markets

Impact of Distributed Ledger Technology in Global Capital Markets
Required "current page"

Expanding HQLAᵡ’s digital registry value proposition for collateral mobilisation

Expanding HQLAᵡ’s digital registry value proposition for collateral mobilisation
Required "current page"

HQLAᵡ Software Engineer (Luxembourg or Zug Switzerland)

HQLAᵡ Software Engineer (Luxembourg or Zug Switzerland)
Required "current page"

HQLAᵡ Secures Series B Strategic Investment from J.P. Morgan

HQLAᵡ Secures Series B Strategic Investment from J.P. Morgan
Required "current page"

Elisa Poutanen and Guido Stroemer discuss the recent series B funding and the exciting new product development opportunities we are working towards

Elisa Poutanen and Guido Stroemer discuss the recent series B funding and the exciting new product development opportunities we are working towards
Required "current page"

Frictionless trade: collateral just the beginning

Frictionless trade: collateral just the beginning
Required "current page"

Interview with J.P. Morgan’s Executive Director, Paul Pirie

Interview with J.P. Morgan’s Executive Director, Paul Pirie
Required "current page"

Interview with Goldman Sachs’ Head of Digital Assets, Mathew McDermott

Interview with Goldman Sachs’ Head of Digital Assets, Mathew McDermott
Required "current page"

BNY Mellon and Goldman Sachs Settle First HQLAᵡ Agency Securities Lending Transactions

BNY Mellon and Goldman Sachs Settle First HQLAᵡ Agency Securities Lending Transactions
Required "current page"

HQLAᵡ and Wematch announce collaboration for common clients

HQLAᵡ and Wematch announce collaboration for common clients
Required "current page"

HQLAᵡ, J.P. Morgan, Ownera and Wematch Demonstrate a Cross-Ledger Repo

HQLAᵡ, J.P. Morgan, Ownera and Wematch Demonstrate a Cross-Ledger Repo
Required "current page"

Collaboration: Innovate, validate and implement

Collaboration: Innovate, validate and implement
Required "current page"

‍Do you want to be the only client without the internet?

‍Do you want to be the only client without the internet?
Required "current page"

Fnality and HQLAᵡ demonstrate together with Banco Santander, Goldman Sachs and UBS, the first cross-chain repo swap pilot across Corda and Enterprise Ethereum

Fnality and HQLAᵡ demonstrate together with Banco Santander, Goldman Sachs and UBS, the first cross-chain repo swap pilot across Corda and Enterprise Ethereum
Required "current page"

Could HQLAᵡ's solution have helped ease market and operational disruptions during the recent UK Gilt volatility?

Could HQLAᵡ's solution have helped ease market and operational disruptions during the recent UK Gilt volatility?
Required "current page"

Sec Lending and Repo DLT Solutions Set to Take Off in 2023

Sec Lending and Repo DLT Solutions Set to Take Off in 2023
Required "current page"